CI
Enter CI, or CO + BSA
Low-flow screen <2.2

The Swan Whisperer
Pressures, flow, oxygen delivery—and the pattern they form.
Swan hemodynamics
Integrated pattern · educational
Enter CI, or CO + BSA
Low-flow screen <2.2
Enter verified mean PAWP
Mean · filling-pressure screen >15
Enter RAP / CVP
Marked-elevation screen >15
Enter CO + MAP
Conventional · cohort reference <0.60
Enter true PA saturation
Context 60–80%; demand-dependent
In-memory comparison only; values disappear on reload or Clear all values. Use labels such as “Baseline” or “After diuresis,” without identifiers. Keep methods and timing comparable.
Educational use only. This tool and its outputs do not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment and do not replace clinical judgment. Independently verify the inputs, equations, assumptions, units, and outputs, and confirm that the tool is appropriate for your intended use before relying on a result.
Educational deterministic calculations. Patient values remain in this browser; they are not uploaded or saved between visits. This tool does not diagnose shock, prescribe treatment, or independently validate a waveform.
Read The Swan-Ganz Catheter: A Practical Guide for Residents for waveforms, normal values and measurement technique.
A bedside reference
Flow, filling pressure, and pulsatility describe different parts of the same snapshot. Start with the measurements, then interpret the markers together.
Right heart
PA pulse pressure relative to RAP.
(PASP − PADP) / RAPLower values can support RV dysfunction. Cutoffs depend on the cohort.Indexed stroke volume × pulmonary pressure gradient.
(CI / HR) × (mPAP − RAP)Raw mmHg·L/m²/beat; ×13.6 for g·m/m²/beat.*Mean PAWP estimates LA pressure.
Conceptual flow map · not an anatomical drawing.
Left heart
Systemic pulse pressure relative to left-sided filling pressure.
(SBP − DBP) / PAWPThe 1.45 reference comes from selected HF outcome cohorts.Flow × mean systemic pressure, expressed in watts.
CO × MAP / 451<0.6 W is a historical prognostic reference in cardiogenic shock.The same shared functions calculate these eight markers here and on their individual pages. Thresholds are prognostic references from specific populations; they are not treatment instructions.
Calculate conventional left ventricular cardiac power output from flow and mean arterial pressure.
CO × MAP / 451W
< 0.6 WHistorical prognostic reference in cardiogenic shock; does not independently diagnose shock or select support.
Calculate PAPi from pulmonary artery pulse pressure and right atrial pressure.
(PASP − PADP) / RAPratio
Population mattersAHA summary: <2. Pre-LVAD study: <1.85. Inferior MI with RV dysfunction: ≤0.9. Loading conditions change the ratio.
Calculate indexed LV work per beat using flow, heart rate, and the systemic-to-left-atrial pressure gradient.
(CI / HR) × (MAP − PAWP) × 13.6g·m/m²/beat
< 20 g·m/m²/beatAssociated with death or deterioration in a transplant-waitlist cohort. No consensus universal cutpoint.
Calculate RV stroke work index in both reporting conventions, with an explicit conversion between them.
(CI / HR) × (mPAP − RAP)mmHg·L/m²/beat · ×13.6 = g·m/m²/beat
0.15–0.33 mmHg·L/m²/beatStudy-specific low-value references, not a normal interval. Equivalent to 2.04–4.49 g·m/m²/beat; compare matching units. Higher work may reflect higher afterload.
Calculate API by relating systemic pulse pressure to mean left-sided filling pressure.
(SBP − DBP) / PAWPratio
< 1.45Associated with adverse outcomes in selected decompensated-HF and transplant-waitlist cohorts; higher values do not exclude LV dysfunction.
Account for right atrial pressure when calculating systemic hydraulic power.
CO × (MAP − RAP) / 451W
No established normal rangeAccounts for the systemic pressure gradient. Do not apply the conventional-CPO 0.6 W reference to this adjusted value.
Calculate RV hydraulic power using cardiac output and the mPAP − RAP gradient.
CO × (mPAP − RAP) / 451W
No consensus cutpointUses mPAP − RAP. Pressure load can raise power despite RV dysfunction. This differs from mPAP-based RV power.
Combine aortic pulsatility index and conventional LV cardiac power into the LV myocardial performance score.
API × conventional CPO / 2score
< 0.5Associated with adverse transplant-waitlist outcomes. Emerging LV score; do not substitute RV MPS or the echocardiographic Tei index.
Use time-aligned measurements, measured MAP when available, and a verified mean PAWP. For stroke work, CI is in L/min/m² and HR in beats/min. SVI expressed in mL/m²/beat uses a 0.0136 conversion factor instead of 13.6.
The integrated screen uses PAPi <2 and RAP / PAWP >0.63, matching the visible result references. These come from different cohorts and do not diagnose RV failure. RVSWI is calculated in both unit conventions but has no universal engine cutoff; it does not vote in the phenotype. Mixed markers prompt review rather than a confirmed RV diagnosis.
The source image also includes RAP numerically exceeding PA saturation. This compares mmHg with saturation entered as a percent (for example, 35 rather than 0.35). It is a rare observational research finding, not a pressure gradient or a validated treatment trigger; it is not used by this calculator’s phenotype engine. Original report ↗
Original MendelMD schematic, informed by the supplied 2025 review figure and the cited studies. Advanced Markers for Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock and End-Stage Heart Failure ↗
What this tool does
The report describes observed invasive hemodynamic physiology. It does not establish shock, determine SCAI stage, identify etiology, or prescribe fluids, medications, or mechanical support.
Waveform review, transducer leveling, respiratory phase, timing, severe tricuspid regurgitation, and cardiac-output method can materially change interpretation.
An end-diastolic wedge is not treated as mean PAWP. PVR, PVRI, gradients, aortic pulsatility index, and PH classification are suppressed until a mean wedge is available.
Every derived metric shows its equation, unit, short interpretation, and limitations. Experimental indices are separated visually and never drive the primary phenotype.
Review the additional measurement-method sources: ELSO VA-ECMO guidance; thermodilution versus estimated Fick study; oximetry-run sampling guidance. This educational calculator has not undergone independent clinical validation. Verify calculations and waveform quality before clinical use.